|
Bob
|
 |
« on: May 28, 2009, 07:47:18 am » |
|
the answer is simple... Yes it can... but will your car run good without the EFEI enhancers ? good question! .... the problem is is that not all cars are alike .... some may well work ok without the EFEI enhanser modifiers... others may not.... and I have seen advertisements on the web about "Our cell doesn't need to have any EFEI enhancers installed !... .... and that is simple BULL ! because its not the cell that determans weather you need a EFEI Enhansor to operate the cell correctly its the car make and model ,engine used and fuel delivery system.... the cell simply makes Browns gas and the car engine burns it.... many older cars Pre-smog type need no additional considerations at all , just hook it in the snorkel to the intake between the air cleaner and carberator and your done.... but Most of the newer cars will need some sort of EFEI adjustment in order to see any improvement in the use of Hydroxy gas...
So don't be fooled into thinking you don't need to mess with the EFEI stuff just because you bought their cell!.... or if they can do it so can I type thinking.... it depends on the car... not the cell .... unfortionately what happens in most cases is the Hydroxy gas added into the air the engine burns along with the fuel spray is sensed by the sensors in the engines exhost and or intake system and it is incorrectly adjusted for by adding more gasoline.... not less and therefore most first trys usually show very little to no improvement in gas mileage gained.... so in MOST cases you will have to use a EFEI enhancer or adjuster or manually lean out the system yourself... in order to see any improvement by using Hydroxy gas.... ... so the statement that says I ran my car with no changes to the EFEI system and gained 28% better gas mileage is both misleading and often misinterpreted , as any car can be done this way, and thats simply not true....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2009, 09:28:47 am » |
|
I've always run an O2 EFIE and a MAF enhancer. I just installed an FS2 and removed everything else. Car runs great & no codes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2009, 12:20:09 pm » |
|
thanks Lee for the input there ! and welcome to the forum ! ... On my Toyota pickup (R-22,5spd 2wd) I went for the Mechanical approach instead of going to the EFI inhansors and haven't regretted a thing!.... I simply installed a "Matt Valve" (I explained what a Matt Valve is in many places on the forum already) (its simply an alternate method of leaning out a fuel injected engine.with a garden hose and valve.)
So it can be done on fuel injected engines without the expense of the electronic gadgets. .... whats interesting to me is that sense I started this Hydroxy stuff, I have learned that the "POINT OF injection" of the Hydroxy gas...and can make all the difference in the world !... I Injected the Hydroxy gas between the Mas-Air-Sensor and the intake manifold...in the snorkel tube that connects the two... I find out NOW that it may be far better to inject the gas just AFTER the air filter...so all the sensors can have their turn sniffing the gas...and the sensors won't try to counteract the Hydroxy gas (the added Oxygen will be taken into account by the computer!) this method may well do away with any need for a Leaning out system all together... but I seriously doubt it simply because car manufacturers like to run cars richer than they need to be. .... I haven't changed the injection point on my truck yet because the Hydroxy cell in still on the bench but when I put it back in the truck I will try the different position and see if that helps in gaining any MPG. .... Bob....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2009, 03:34:39 pm » |
|
Bob, Very true about the injection point. Unfortunately, there is no set point for all vehicles. Guess that's why we experiment. Most vehicles will run better if the inlet is in the air cleaner box in a corner away from the mainstream. This allows the hydroxy to mix more thoroughly with the incoming air, hence being displaced more evenly over the cylinders.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2009, 05:47:03 pm » |
|
that's a thought ! ... but I'd worry about filling up the air cleaner box full of Volatile Hydroxy gas ! a gallon of that stuff going off under your hood would ruin your day ! LOL that is why I adopted the strategy of turning off the hydroxy unit about 5 to 10 min before I get home...because even after the unit is turned off it will continue to produce some Hydroxy gas for a time... this depends on how long the unit has been ran and many other factors... I do the same in town and usually turn off the unit as I pull into the parking lot.... I try to suck all the hydroxy gas out of the system before I turn off the engine.... I feel this is a good practice to get into <GRIN> ... I plan on injecting the gas at the air cleaner connection to the intake system, not in the box, for the reason above... but sense they are in such close proximity it makes little difference because if the unit is left on for some reason it will fill the air box anyway if the engine is not running... but with the engine running there is very little chance of that happening unless your pushing more than 8 to 10LPM ....even on a smaller engine. sense the intake on my truck is quite long I really haven't worried much about mixing the gas with the intake air much...i figure by the time it reaches the cylinders its very well mixed by then, but on some cars that is a serious consideration ! so you make a very good point there Lee thank you ! ... Bob.......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2009, 09:08:35 pm » |
|
Bob, I hear wher you're coming from, but trust me. It's better to have it in your airbox than anywhere else. Unfortunately, my PC crashed a few months back & I lost the photos I took when my intake manifold (plastic) exploded. Made quite a big bang, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2009, 11:20:30 pm » |
|
ACK PLASTIC Intake manifold ? how silly ! what kind of vehicle ya got so I know what not to get? LOL I blew the top appart on the radiator found out it was plastic as well on the Toyota Cilica ! tat really cought me off guard.... Plastic radiator top  I guess, if they can make plastic radiator tops they should be able to make intake manifolds too ! hehehehe just seams silly to me ! hehehe give them time and I bet they'll make the engine block out'a plastic.... its cheeper than alumimum... and Money drives changes !LOL ... I believe ya Lee on the injection point.... but the thought of that air box filling up scares the heck out'a me..... I suppose that just means you don't forget to turn the generator off ! ... sure the generator is on a relay that goes off with the ignition key... but as I said a generator will continue to make hydroxy gas for some time after shut down..... perhaps a high value resistor and Diode between the hot side of the generator and ground would take care of the "Run on" after its turned off eh ?.... Randy has a LED on his on /off switch that stays lit for about 1 minute after its turned off.... perhaps that LED is shortening the run on time by grounding it out ? I've watched mine bubble for 5 minutes after shut down, after a long drive... maybe I'm the only one that noticed that but seams like its not a good thing! .... Bob.......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2009, 12:30:38 pm » |
|
Yeah Bob, No bull. '98 Explorer 4.0 plastic upper & lower intake. Actually, I'm at work now and just found a picture of it on my office PC. If ya look to the right, you'll see the top of the driver side plenum is gone!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2009, 01:55:36 pm » |
|
Ouch ! yah I can see that a BIG section is missing ! Hydroxy gas did that ? ... Do you have any pics of your generator to share with us ? what is it, and how many LPM do you get from it ? ... what were the results of your adding the Hydroxy generator to your truck ? ( besides the blown intake manifold !) did you get an Increase in MPG ? ...and what size is that engine anyway ? ... Bob.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2009, 03:07:29 pm » |
|
Bob, Pics. of my gen. are on my page. '98 Explorer 4x4, 4.0 litre, A/T. Cell is 6x6 304ss, 3mm Buna-N rings for gaskets. 19 plates/3 stacks/18 cells. Output is 1 litre in 40 seconds. It took a while, but I started with 16.5 mpg and am now getting 21.4 with the FS2 in place.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 13, 2009, 04:33:07 pm by Lee Hazleton »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2009, 08:25:59 pm » |
|
Thanks Lee ! Now... where is your page <GRIN> sounds like an interesting cell design I'ed like to know more ! ... your output is about 1.5LPM which isn't bad at all really... but at how many amps ? it sounds to me like the cell design can handle Hundreds of amps without any problem I'm guessing your running 20 amps now but I'm wondering if you ever tried to run 50 or more amps? ... a 4.0 liter engine is Huge ! but Hydrotech achieved over 75mpg with his big duely truck and useing extensive modifications at the time he was getting 8 or 12 LPM from his 3 cells combined...the engine is a 6.0 liter I think( chevy ,or GMC I think) infact he had enough Hydroxy gas to actually run the engine down the block and back with the gasoline turned OFF.... he said it ran like Shit...but it did run !.... Some day if I'm very lucky I Hope to have 15LPM to play with in my 2.5Liter R-22 Toyota p/u.... I figure if I can get that much I can run it on Hydroxy gas alone! hehehehehe ... Bob......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2009, 09:22:43 am » |
|
Sorry, my 'page' is on another site. This one won't let me upload photo's. Says the file is too large. Anywho, it's drawing 20 amps.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 29, 2009, 09:26:58 am by Lee Hazleton »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tink
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2009, 09:49:40 am » |
|
Lee, You gotta shoot at 640x480 to be able to upoad photos here. If you are using a digital camera there should be a wayo adjust that on the camera. Or you could copy a link to the photo into your post. Tink
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Old Tink proberb: Don't hesitate, just do it!
|
|
|
Lee Hazleton
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 58
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2009, 10:06:24 am » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2009, 12:18:06 pm » |
|
Yah.. sorry about the size restriction guys but its necessary to keep the Megabits used in check ! 300k is not much straight from a camera because their compression is minimal but if you run that same pic through a program it can drop to a mere 100k or less I routinely post 2 800x600 pics at a time but only after running them through correl draw and saving them as a .Jpg bitmap file... makes them less than half their regular size. ... Actually, I hadn't realized that it was such a pain for you guys.... what size would be convenient for you to up-load  ? I can change it ! ... Bob,.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
|
|
|
|