Hydroxy Hut
May 22, 2012, 05:11:51 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Hydroxy Hut discovered!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2  All
  Print  
Author Topic: THE BIG CELL  (Read 2776 times)
ROADKING
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


« on: January 12, 2009, 04:21:36 pm »

I am in the process of building two new cells, the one that I have almost completed is a LARGE DRY CELL.  It is made with 316ss,18 gauge,101 plates measuring 8"x8" with a space of 1/16" between plates.  It has a 1" gasket between the plates.  It is wired with a positive on one end and a negative on the other, the rest being neutrals.  So how many amps would this cell take,(which I think will be mega amps) and what should be the production rate.  I am going to start the cell at 50 amps.  I am connecting it to an inverter and then to a bridge rectifier.  I have already completed conditioning the pates and I am now at the point of reconstructing it with the gaskets and seals.
Logged
Bob
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3088



« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2009, 05:28:39 am »

Road King:
 with what you discribed I think you will have a bunch of truble getting any output at all out of the thing.... the reason is the distance between the driven plates about all te distance you can get and still get good production for neutral plates is only about 3" to 4" max.  any greater distance between the end plates(driven plates) will reduce your output a huge amount !
... I will guess that the plates are close to 1/16" thick and sense you have 1/16" gaskets thats 1/8"
per plate and gasket... mutiply that by 101 and the length is ....101/8 /8=12.825"
so your BIG cell will be around 12-3/4" long between the driven plates, too long for any practical driveing of neutral plates... although I believe that is what Bob Boyce actually did... but he had to use a maximum concentration in the electrolyte in order to do that.
which means a PWM that can handle the high amperage...
Now, on the other hand you could place a driven plate every 3"  making the driven plates number 5 in the cell and the rest neutral, beginning with a positive driven plate on both ends and driveing towards a negitive plate with a positive plate in the middle so you'ed have 3 positive plates and 2 negitive driven plates, which should work very well for you
....
8x8=64" each plate one side all the neutral plates will be calculated as only one side because that is how a neutral plate works 1/2 of its thickness is pos the other negitive.
so if you hook it up the way I am sujesting you'll have 50 negitive sides to the plates and 2 plates with 2 sides both being negitive, so that makes 52 negitive sides of 8x8 that will be produceing gas.
64x52= 3328 square inches ( notice I am useing Mantas calculateing method)
now with 3328 sqr inches. if you fed it ONLY 0.01 amp per square inch  that makes
0.01x3328=33.28 amps total... we already know that that will result in an extreamily low production output, so what happens if we give it .03 amps per square inch .
0.03x3328=94.84amps
....
 However... that is only 300th of an amp per square inch.... thats not very much at all
the Randy cell according to my calculations used a diferent method of calculation  to come upwith the amps per square inch figure which would not be valid in this case so we need to calculate the randy cell useing the same method... 2"SS washer with 1/2" center hole
3.14159x2"=6,283sqr inches.  .5x3.14159=1570 ( airea of the hole in the middle)
6.284-1.570=4.714Square inches on 1 side per washer
out of the 11 washers 5 are negitive and are surrounded on each side by pos plates so we need both sides of the 5 washers to get the area. or 4.714x5x2=47.14 square inches (using Mantas method)...
that 47.14 sqrin. produces 2LPM at 20amps
so 20amps /47.14=0.42426 amps per square inch in the "Randy cell"
so the output is 2LPM /47.14=0.042426 LPM per sqr inch...
so now we can use those figures on your cell dimentions to see what it COULD produce if you used the proper amperage...
3328 sqr inches times 0.042426= 141.193 LPM
at 3328x0.42426 =1411.93 amps...
Ok.... obviously thats not going to happen  halving that is still 700amps and gives 0.21213
and halves the output as well to 70.59LPM
still way too high but if we chop it by 4 times (devide by 4) we get
175 amps
17.64 LPM
and only 0.05303 amps per square inch....
which means... its amps per square inch is so low at 175 amps... I have no idea what it will put out!  its too low to be anywhere near the Randy cell output per square inch...
so its realy hard to say just what it would put out....
even at 200amps...

however the 700amps at 70.5LPM is probly a reasonable asumption.
......
I actially hope someone finds fault in my calculations because thats realy abisimal output
....hehehehehe

Bob......

Logged

"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
Bob
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3088



« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2009, 05:51:33 am »

humm after looking at that for a bit I realised that the Randy cell APSI is only a tad higher than that of the .03 at 99amps... so my calculations of over 1000 amps has to be bogus!<GRIN>
even if it gives over 70LPM!
if we take the sqr inch of the randy cell that gives 2LPM at .04APSI then we should be safe to asume that 3328/47.14= 70.598 (remember thats 2 LPM for each time it goes into it)so 70.59x2= 141.91LPM at or near 200amps   if you can get theamps per sqr inch that high
 that seams unusually high  remember the old 10:1 addage...  amps per LPM?  that doesn't follow suit at all the output is too high for that... at 200 amps  you should get 20LPM
not over 100 or even 70.......
so its safe to say if you put in 200 amps the most you could get is 20LPM output
100amps  10LPM.... however the calculations are not playing fair so I simply dunno !HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH
.... hopefully someone will strighten out my mess !
...
Bob....
Logged

"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
ROADKING
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2009, 10:45:08 am »

Well I think I have almost completed conditioning my plates.  I conditioned my pates with just the spacers in them so they would clean easier, so the sludge or coffee grounds would come out of them.  One thing to consider which wont change a lot is that I now have a one inch gasket to go in the cell between each plate, which will now equal 79 inches per plate.  I am now going to wire it (Bob) as you suggested in the earlier post and at that time we will see what it does.  I have talked to a person in Calif. who is working with Boyce and he tell me if I use his pwm it will produce up to 3 times as much hydro, and then if I were to add a toroidal coil, that at that time i will produce 5 times over that, and that there will be less than 1 amp at the pwm. This will be with an inverter of 1200 watts continuous use, a toroidal coil, a bridge rectifier, and a pwm.  Thanks for all the input.
Logged
Bob
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3088



« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2009, 08:05:02 pm »

Oh yah !!!! i forgot the gasket area ! bummer deal dude ! HAHAHHAHA
oh well, as you can see the figures didn't come out very well at all but if you can get a 10 amp to 1LPM ratio out of the cell you will be dong fantastic the more common attempt yields 10amps to .75LPM
still at 101 plates you should have a very good chance of produceing more than enough for a v8 engine and if your very lucky perhaps even enough to go 100% hydroxy !
...
although I don't hold much stock in the torodial concept it does make sense that a strong magnetic field on the vapor cloud would brake it down even more...which is a good thing.
to me its kind'a like putting a magnet on your gas line and clameing 25% better gasmilage !
<GRIN> for one its going to take one heck of a strong magnet to do ANYTHING to the gas going through the line and the ones that they sell ya are not that strong ,heheheheh
I feel at his stage of the game you'ed be better off putting the amperage that would be going into the Troidial coil, into your Hydroxy cell instead.
... don't get me wrong here , There is a place for strong magnetic fields in Hydroxy generation... and I believe that you could dispense entirely with the plates and go with electromagnets instead... if you made them strong enough... because it is the magnetic fields on the plates that do the work in the first place so if you could duplicate that
you'ed have it.... but that is the entire point of the plates, its much easier to do it with plates than one big magnetic field.
so personally I won't bother making a toridial coil unless someone realy proves to me that it makes a big diference, Stan Mayer and Bob Boyce both say the coils are needed that they help production... but as I said takeing that much amperage away from the plates has the reverse effect as well when you could put that much more into the plates...
and those coils take a bunch of amps, are hard to make, and are very expensive parts to get IF you can find them !
the best adaption I've seen yet was on the Joe cell where his high quality stainless steel container was wrapped in heavy wire as a magnetic coil... the idea was briliant, as most Aussie inventions are <GRIN> but his followers dispenced with the coil of wire thinking that it served no real concrete purpose. (to his shrigrin I am sure!<GRIN>)
...on something as Different as Bob Boyces's 101plate cell its probably best to duplicate his work as much as you can... even his PWM because he painstakingly made that thing for resonant effects. he got over 47LPM if I remember right, but was very quiet on how many amps it took to do that....maybe I just didn't see that part... but at 470 amps or 500amps
its not unreasonable at all to achieve that much LPM....
that kind of amperage is religated to the test bench in most cases however, getting that much out of altenators is a tough task !
...
My 2 coppers!
...
Bob......

Logged

"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
ROADKING
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2009, 10:32:19 am »

Bob,
On the toroidal coil,  I have spoke to some people about this, and the way we see it is that this coil is more less a step up transformer,  It consist of 3 primary phases,(all switching at different intervals and all set at different frequencies) and 1 secondary, which this is where it appears to me that it is producing the 3 different frequencies along with voltage spikes.  Boyce claims to be operating this cell  at 200 volts at 60 amps with the volts starting at 150 ac volts from the inverter, and producing 45 or more litres.  So I don't know but this is what I will be working toward, and I will try to keep you posted on how I progress.
Logged
Manta
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 736



« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2009, 11:06:25 am »

Roadking,

re,...I have talked to a person in Calif. who is working with Boyce and he tell me if I use his pwm it will produce up to 3 times as much hydro, and then if I were to add a toroidal coil, that at that time i will produce 5 times over that, and that there will be less than 1 amp at the pwm. This will be with an inverter of 1200 watts continuous use, a toroidal coil, a bridge rectifier, and a pwm....

Maybe you could put up a couple of diagrams to help explain just how this idea works.  I would be careful.
I suspect the there is a thin coating of snake oil involved somewhere.
All this talk of changing frequencies etc needs a bit more light shedding on it.

Manta
Logged

Good questions have a sting in the tail.
Manta
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 736



« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2009, 11:16:00 am »

Roadking,
additional.

Re ....I am going to start the cell at 50 amps.  I am connecting it to an inverter and then to a bridge rectifier....

As the word 'inverter' tends to mean something different in the UK to what it means in the USA,  could you describe to me what you mean by it.  Over here it means a device that converts DC from,  say,  a battery,  to AC for normal AC lighting etc.

Not trying to be picky,  just wanting to make sure that I am reading you correctly.

Manta
Logged

Good questions have a sting in the tail.
ROADKING
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2009, 11:24:13 am »

Manta, the inverter will be going from 12 volt dc to the inverter to 120 ac volt and then to the bridge rectifier to 120 dc AS far as snake oil I think there is a lot of that just for that almighty dollar if you know what I mean.LOL
Logged
Manta
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 736



« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2009, 11:28:09 am »

Roadking,

Thanks for that,  it's what I thought you meant. Mind you don't fry yourself with that 120 volt DC.  Unlike AC it doesn't let go between each cycle. Grin
Manta
Logged

Good questions have a sting in the tail.
Manta
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 736



« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2009, 11:33:27 am »

Roadking,

Is this the system you are going to run at 50 Amp ?  If so, that will give you 120 * 50 =6000 Watt.  can your inverter handle that ?

Manta
Logged

Good questions have a sting in the tail.
ROADKING
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2009, 02:48:23 pm »

I am suppose to be able to acquire this with a 1200 watt inverter.  Then the coil and pwm will cause something like 10 times spike current equaling 11kws if I remember all the numbers correctly.  You can see the schematic under the Bob Boyce 101 plate cell.
Logged
hg2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 255



« Reply #12 on: January 14, 2009, 04:10:46 pm »


  Roadking Bob Boyce later found that 81 plates were more efficient than 101.I'll look up where I read that and post it when I find it.

  It will require a toroidal coil along with chokes to achieve the same results Bob Boyce had.Toroidal coils aren't cheap,I don't know how much research you've done on them,but winding one takes high skill and precision windings to build.It will take a 6.5 iron powder core coil to achieve what Bob Boyce accomplished using them.This technology will require strong electronics knowledge to build.

  But if you got the wallet and the knowledge I say go for it.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2009, 04:16:41 pm by hg2 » Logged
ROADKING
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


« Reply #13 on: January 14, 2009, 05:28:39 pm »

The powder iron core runs about $50.00. I found the wire to wind it with the Teflon silver plated solid copper core at about .21 per foot,  however I am awaiting for one to be built and it was priced to me at $380.  You are correct in the time and precision it takes to build.  Far as the money you tell me where do you quit, for I have already spent a lot of money trying to make this work,lol.  NOW IF IT WORKS IT WILL BE WORTH IT I think.  Bob Boyce also states to double this production of the 101 plate cell (6x6 plates) to build it with 6x9 plates,  So we are going to build this on as soon as I receive the electrical components.  I have told my friend that if this does not work I will be ready to quit, he say no we are not going to quit, lol,  But I will know I would guess by Spring maybe.
Logged
Bob
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3088



« Reply #14 on: January 14, 2009, 07:04:17 pm »

Bob,
On the toroidal coil,  I have spoke to some people about this, and the way we see it is that this coil is more less a step up transformer,  It consist of 3 primary phases,(all switching at different intervals and all set at different frequencies) and 1 secondary, which this is where it appears to me that it is producing the 3 different frequencies along with voltage spikes.  Boyce claims to be operating this cell  at 200 volts at 60 amps with the volts starting at 150 ac volts from the inverter, and producing 45 or more litres.  So I don't know but this is what I will be working toward, and I will try to keep you posted on how I progress.

I hate it when people quote stuff and don't  take what ya ment but the words only , so I seldom ever use the option of "Quoting" a person so please forgive me in this case <GRIN>
 ...
I did read about the 3 different fazes that Boyce used and because of the resonance
it upped his output a huge amount....
 but all in all, he is calming 45LPM at 60 amps ! do you realize that ?....
that is 15LPM at 20 amps !!!!!!!!!!!
Far be it from me to say that word "IMPOSABLE!" but Man I dunno ,that one really stretches the imagination !  any thing is possible but good grief...  thats more production per amp than the arc generator !...and as far as I know that is the worlds best Hydroxy producer!
... at this stage I am thinking along the same lines as Manta and "Snake-oil"
but that doesn't mean you can't make a big cell that will produce allot of Hydroxy gas out of it !  simply because you have the plate area now, you just need the Hellacious Amprage it will take to make high LPM...and that CAN be done if all else fails, so if Bob Boyces
Mirical cure to the LPM problem doesn't work for you remember there is always the brute force method and that is about 400amps (to get your 40LPM)
so don't give up even if that method don't work !
...
 When I read what he did I was impressed with his abilities because I can't do that stuff anymore, and I doubt I could even get to first base trying to make his PWM... and sense I have made Troidial coils before I wouldn't even attempt to make the Monster he made up, so if you can buy it then do !!!! especially with 3 seperate fazeing coils in it!
...
but Keep in mind Manta's Calculations for the wattage needed when you get all your eggs in one basket you don't want to burn it all up in the first "Smoke test!"
...
I'm rootin' fer ya ! and I hope it works but in all honnesty I don't see how it can !
I'ed go the brute force method and be done with it ! it would probly cost you the same in the long run ! <GRIN>
sorry for the wet blanket on the party!
good luck !
Bob......
Logged

"Mother always told me "Son the Imposable is only a little bit harder"...and You know ... She WAS RIGHT!"
Pages: [1] 2  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!